Although better, the disparity is still grossly disproportionate. Before this law was passed, the united states had a 100to1 cracktopowder cocaine sentencing disparity. Congress acts to reduce crackpowder cocaine sentencing. Today the house judiciary committee subcommittee on crime, terrorism, and homeland securityis holding a hearing on the disparity between crack and powder cocaine sentences.
The us house of representatives wednesday approved a bill, sb 1789, that addresses one of the most glaring injustices of the american drug war. President obama signed the new sentencing law on august 3, 2010. Therefore, the danger associated with crack cocaine versus powder cocaine instead relates to the trade of the drug, not the drug itself. Now, the ten year sentence is triggered by 280 grams of crack instead of 50. And yet, thanks to science, common sense, and the supreme court, the vast disparity between crack and powder sentencing is. Keith ellison spent 16 years as a trial lawyer dealing with hundreds of cases involving cocaine arrests. We wrote this paper to inform the public and congress about the disparities in the sentencing laws between crack and powder cocaine, which. Today states maintain sentencing disparities between crack and powder cocaine offenses. Crackpowder cocaine disparity hearing today talkleft. The disparity started in the 1980s, when crack cocaine started to ravish urban black communities in america. The amount of powder cocaine necessary to trigger the sentence is still five kilos. A comprehensive examination of the 100to1 crack versus powder cocaine sentencing disparity under which distribution of just 5 grams of crack carries a minimum 5year federal prisonsentence, while distribution of 500 grams of powder cocaine carries the same 5year mandatory minimum sentence.
We wrote this paper to inform the public and congress about the disparities in the sentencing laws between crack and powder cocaine. That resulted in a disparity with powder of about 18 to 1. Crack cocaine sentences have long been much more harsh than those for powder cocaine. Before 1986, federal sentencing laws treated possession of crack and powder cocaine the same. The bill does not eliminate the disparity, but dramatically reduces it. Under the 2010 law, the amount of crack that triggers the fiveyear minimum is 28 grams of crack or 500 grams of powder, and, for the tenyear minimum, 280 grams of crack and 5,000 of powder. Statistics show that black people are more likely to be convicted of crack cocaine offenses even though the majority of crack cocaine users are white and white people are more likely to be convicted of powder cocaine offenses. In committing ourselves to pursuing federal cocaine sentencing policy reform, we do not suggest in any way that our prosecutors or law enforcement agents have acted improperly or imprudently during the last 15 years. Senator dick durbin, the sentencing disparity between crack and powder cocaine has contributed to the imprisonment of african americans at six times the rate of whites and to the united states position as the worlds leader in incarcerations. The sentencing commission, an independent agency within.
Race and class penalties in crack cocaine sentencing by michael coyle overview after a decade of contentious debate regarding the federal sentencing disparities between crack cocaine and powder cocaine, a number of significant initiatives to reform current policy. Most disturbingly, because the majority of people arrested for crack offenses are african american. On october 30, president clinton signed a bill that blocks the u. Richard durbin, dil, introduced the fair sentencing act of 2009, which would put an end to over two decades of excessively punitive sentencing policy for crack cocaine offenses. Under the old sentencing guidelines, the penalty for possessing a gram of crack cocaine was the same as that for possessing 100 grams or about 312 ounces of powder cocaine, with a corresponding. As introduced, the fair sentencing acts provisions would have completely eliminated the sentencing disparity between crack and powder cocaine and its impact in reducing racial disparity and growing federal incarceration rates would have been more dramatic.
How an early biden crime bill created the sentencing. Since then the federal bureau of prisons began to have budget and overcrowding problems. The bipartisan measure addressed the 100to1 disparity that punished defendants with five grams of crack cocaine also known as cocaine base with the same fiveyear mandatory minimum penalty imposed on powder cocaine defendants with 100 times that amount. This disparity between crack and powder cocaine was driven by fear, instead of by research, of the intensity and perceived dangers of crack. Activists argue that the current rules are too harsh. Its a dirty drug that shouldnt exist, but unfortunately it does. Why is there a sentencing disparity between possession of. The crackpowder disparity grew out of a 1986 law that was passed in response to violent crimes committed to get money to feed crack habits. Because crack and powder cocaine are two forms of the same drug, there should not be any disparity in sentencing between crack and powder cocaine offenses the only truly fair ratio is 1. High court eases crack sentence guidelines cbs news. The amount of powder cocaine necessary to trigger the sentence is still fivekilos. The 100to1 crack cocaine to powder cocaine quantity ratio is a primary cause of the growing disparity between sentences for black and white federal defendants, the commission wrote.
Crack cocaine first hit the national radar in 1986 but, contrary to media reports, it was not a new drug. Congress moves to narrow sentencing disparities for crack. Proposals to eliminate sentencing disparities between. The fair sentencing act of 2010 was an important first step in restoring sanity to our sentencing laws for crackcocaine, but theres more that needs to be done. Some 2020 democratic candidate argue that the sentencing disparity between crack cocaine and powder cocaine, which now sits at 18 to 1, should be eliminated entirely. In the mid 80s, congress passed the antidrug abuse act of 1986.
The federal government sought to crack down on the problem by implementing severe prison sentences for those people caught dealing crack cocaine. Federal crack cocaine sentencing the sentencing project. Now that disparity is being reduced from 100to1 to 18to1. Obama commutes sentences for 8 in crack cocaine cases. Some 2020 democratic candidate argue that the sentencing disparity between crack cocaine and powder cocaine, which now sits at 18to1.
The precise terms of the legislation that would address the discrepancy were somewhat more difficult to devise. The 1986 and 1988 antidrug abuse acts created a disparity in sentencing between two forms of cocaine, crack cocaine and powder, at the federal level even though scientific evidence, including a. John conyers, dmichigan, recently contended that the new law will reduce sentencing disparity between crack and powder cocaine from 100to1 to 18to1. Crack is highly, highly addictive unlike normal cocain. Crack cocaine and powder cocaine are the same drug, simply sold in different forms. The sentencing disparities between crack and cocaine attn. The fair sentencing act amends existing laws by increasing the amounts of crack that trigger these penalties, from five grams to 28 grams for fiveyear minimum sentences and from 50 grams to 280 grams for tenyear minimum sentences. Congress is considering a bill to change drug laws that punish crack cocaine violations more severely than those for powder cocaine. An end to crackpowder cocaine sentencing disparity. This sentencing disparity has had a disproportionate impact on poor people and people of color. Sentencing commission amendments to equalize the penalties for crack and powder cocaine from taking effect see congress nixes amendments to sentencing guidelines on cocaine, money laundering, 58 crl 1086, october 25, 1995. The obama administration endorsed eliminating the crackpowder sentencing disparity during hearings on the issue.
The house of representatives passed a bill on wednesday that would reduce the disparities between mandatory federal sentences for crack and powder cocaine violations, a step toward ending what. In missouri, where a defendant convicted of selling. The research study confirms that crack tends to be used by a more marginalized segment of society, and it is this socioeconomically disadvantaged segment of society who is at higher risk for arrest and subject to the 18. Congress addressed a historic wrong on wednesday afternoon, replacing it instead with a slightly lesser wrong, when the house voted to reduce the disparity in the sentencing of people caught with crack cocaine versus powder cocaine. It eliminates the disparity in federal sentencing for crack versus powder cocaine offenses, without a shift in the current powder cocaine penalty. The hearing is called unfairness in federal cocaine sentencing. Increase the quantity of crack cocaine needed to trigger a mandatory sentence. Data show racial disparity in crack sentencing us news. Support fair and rational sentencing by eliminating the. Clinton signs bill to disapprove of equalizing crack.
On march 17, 2010, the fair sentencing act of 2009 s. Fair sentencing act american civil liberties union. The bill would reduce but not completely eliminate the sentencing disparity by reducing it. In 2010 congress passed the fair sentencing act, which repealed the mandatory minimum sentence for simple possession and reduced the sentencing disparity from 100. In 2010, there was bipartisan support in congress for reducing the disparity in sentences between crack and powder cocaine, against a backdrop of crime rates that have plunged to the lowest levels. The sentencing disparity between these two drug offenses is. Durbin introduces bill to end crackpowder sentencing. Under what is commonly referred to as the 100to1 cocaine sentencing disparity, it takes one hundred times as much powder cocaine as crack cocaine. Crackpowder sentencing disparity reduced by congress. Under the current law, crack users possessing only 5 grams of the drug are charged with a felony to get the same charge, powder cocaine users have to be caught with 500 grams. Congress narrows disparity between sentences for crack vs. What is the chemical difference between crack cocaine and powder cocaine. Why are crack cocaine sentences longer than those for. The sentencing disparity for dealing crack and powder cocaine was 100 to 1.
The 1986 law created a 100 to 1 disparity between the sentencing guidelines for crack and powder cocaine. Since the law went into effect, the ratio dropped to 18to1. That year, national news outlets began reporting inflammatory anecdotes supposedly revealing a crack epidemic. A comprehensive examination of the 100to1 crack versus powder cocaine sentencing disparity under which distribution of just 5 grams of crack carries a. For example, the possession of 2 ounces of crack cocaine carried a 10 year mandatory minimum jail sentence compared to 179 ounces of powder cocaine for the same penalty. Criminal division aag breuer testimony re restoring. We did our last update on president obamas campaign promise to eliminate the disparity in sentencing for crack and cocaine on july 14, 2010. Eliminate the sentencing disparity by instituting a 1. Further resolved, that the iacp urges that any modifications to eliminate the disparity between crack and powder cocaine sentencing be made by significantly adjusting downward the cocaine powder mandatory minimum amount to levels which correspond to the current levels for crack so that the law enforcement community will still be able to deal. Attempts to change the disparity edit legal challenges edit. New legislation would erase crackpowder cocaine disparity. The next logical steps are to make the fsa retroactive, and to eradicate completely the. The house, by voice vote, approved a bill reducing the disparities between mandatory crack and powder cocaine sentences, sending the measure to president barack obama for. Reducing the crackpowder cocaine disparity drug war facts.
One would think, based on the sentencing laws, that crack cocaine is a very different drug than powder cocaineand much worse. A 2010 federal law rectified some, though not all, of the sentencing disparities. After president obama signed off on new legislation to reduce the sentencing disparity between people caught with crack cocaine and those caught with powder cocaine, the minnesota democrat spoke to huffpost about what it. It also brings crack sentencing in line with powder cocaine, as well as with all other drugs, by applying mandatory minimums only to dealers and not those convicted of simple possession.
1421 1078 164 473 38 313 473 1222 1181 545 1389 372 1013 490 652 1312 400 278 1421 317 28 865 1060 311 1446 1431 1101 634 846 1049 884 739 1066 1 1188 741 15 345 77 53 166 769